Jackson ex dem. Tillotson v. Stiles
11 Johns. 195
This text of 11 Johns. 195 (Jackson ex dem. Tillotson v. Stiles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jackson ex dem. Tillotson v. Stiles, 11 Johns. 195 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1814).
Opinion
Where two attorneys are jointly concerned for a party, they should appoint a joint agent; otherwise the adverse party may be embarrassed in the service of notices, and be led into mistake. The agent of one is not necessarily the agent of both. The default and subsequent proceedings must be set aside.
Rule granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kennedy & Hoy v. John Q. Adams & Co.
5 Del. 160 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1849)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 Johns. 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-tillotson-v-stiles-nysupct-1814.