Jackson ex dem. Tillotson v. Stiles

11 Johns. 195
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1814·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Where two attorneys are jointly concerned for a party, they should appoint a joint agent; otherwise the adverse party may be embarrassed in the service of notices, and be led into mistake. The agent of one is not necessarily the agent of both. The default and subsequent proceedings must be set aside.

Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson ex dem. Tillotson v. Stiles, 11 Johns. 195 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1814).

11 Johns. 195 (Jackson ex dem. Tillotson v. Stiles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kennedy & Hoy v. John Q. Adams & Co.
5 Del. 160 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1849)