Jackson ex dem. Tibbits v. Williams
This text of 2 Johns. 297 (Jackson ex dem. Tibbits v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The title of the lessors of the plaintiff was fully made out upon the trial. According to BJeeck-ej-’s map and survey, which has heretofore received the sanction of this court, the premises in question are included within lot No. 48. The defence set up was, that the line to which the defendant claims had been established by Volkert P. Douw, the former proprietor of lot 48, and that the lessors of the plaintiff are now concluded by his acts from contesting that line. But the facts in. the case are not sufficient to support that inference, or to prove that Douw had done any act, or given any assent which ought to have concluded him from asserting his right.
Judgment for the plaintiff.
In this, and in the eases which were-argued at the last term, Mr. Jugttee Van Ness took-no part in the Judgments delivered by the^court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Johns. 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-tibbits-v-williams-nysupct-1807.