Jackson ex dem. Thompson v. Stiles

9 Johns. 391
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1812
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 9 Johns. 391 (Jackson ex dem. Thompson v. Stiles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson ex dem. Thompson v. Stiles, 9 Johns. 391 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1812).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The first writ of possession has never been returned, and though a year and a day has intervened between the term at which the first writ was returnable and the issuing of the second, a scire facias was not requisite to revive the judgment. The first execution may have been continued down en the roll, to the time of issuing the second execution. As this may be done at any time, and is a thing merely of technical form, we will presume it to have been done in this case. Nothing appears to contradict this presumption, and the facts stated show that the party has never had the full fruit of his judgment, and justice and equity require that he should have it.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winebrener v. Johnson
7 Abb. Pr. 202 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1869)
Sacia v. Nestle
13 How. Pr. 572 (New York Supreme Court, 1856)
Mayor v. Evertson
1 Cow. 36 (New York Supreme Court, 1823)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Johns. 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-thompson-v-stiles-nysupct-1812.