Jackson ex dem. Starr v. Richmond

4 Johns. 483
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1809·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The general rule is, that a person ought not to be made lessor, who has no claim or pretension to a subsisting title or interest in the premises. If any person, v.ho may have once had a title, is to be made lessor, the burthen of deducing a title from him, is taken iron the plaintiff, and thrown on the tenant, which [484]*484would be unreasonable. Potior est tonditio possidentis. If there is a case that ought to be excepted from the general rule, it ought to be clearly and specially stated to the court. The motion must be denied.

Rule refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson ex dem. Starr v. Richmond, 4 Johns. 483 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1809).

4 Johns. 483 (Jackson ex dem. Starr v. Richmond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Society for the Propagation of the Gospel v. Hartland
22 F. Cas. 753 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1874)
Doe ex dem. McConnel v. Johnson
3 Ill. 522 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1840)
Jackson ex dem. Abby v. Smith
6 Cow. 39 (New York Supreme Court, 1826)
Jackson ex dem. Harris v. Murray
1 Cow. 156 (New York Supreme Court, 1823)
Bogart v. M'Donald
2 Johns. Cas. 219 (New York Supreme Court, 1801)