Jackson ex dem. Southampton v. Cooly

New York Supreme Court

Jackson ex dem. Southampton v. Cooly

2 Johns. Cas. 223

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1801

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Johns. Cas. 223 (Jackson ex dem. Southampton v. Cooly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson ex dem. Southampton v. Cooly, 2 Johns. Cas. 223 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1801).

Pincite

Opinion

*Per Curiam.

The plaintiff has not proved any seisin or title in the lessors, or those under whom he claims ; and the defendant has shown a title out of the lessors. The evidence about the agreement for a lease, which appears neverlo have been carried into effect, is not sufficient to give the plaintiff the possession. It does not appear that the defendant was put into possession by the lessors, or that he ever paid them any rent. The defendant must have judgment.

Judgment for the defendant.(

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*Per Curiam.

The plaintiff has not proved any seisin or title in the lessors, or those under whom he claims ; and the defendant has shown a title out of the lessors. The evidence about the agreement for a lease, which appears neverlo have been carried into effect, is not sufficient to give the plaintiff the possession. It does not appear that the defendant was put into possession by the lessors, or that he ever paid them any rent. The defendant must have judgment.

Judgment for the defendant.(

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Johns. Cas. 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-southampton-v-cooly-nysupct-1801.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack