Jackson ex dem. Southampton v. Cooly

2 Johns. Cas. 223
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1801·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*Per Curiam.

The plaintiff has not proved any seisin or title in the lessors, or those under whom he claims ; and the defendant has shown a title out of the lessors. The evidence about the agreement for a lease, which appears neverlo have been carried into effect, is not sufficient to give the plaintiff the possession. It does not appear that the defendant was put into possession by the lessors, or that he ever paid them any rent. The defendant must have judgment.

Judgment for the defendant.(

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson ex dem. Southampton v. Cooly, 2 Johns. Cas. 223 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1801).

2 Johns. Cas. 223 (Jackson ex dem. Southampton v. Cooly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whitney v. Wright
15 Wend. 171 (New York Supreme Court, 1836)