Jackson ex dem. Pioneer v. Garnsey
This text of 3 Cow. 385 (Jackson ex dem. Pioneer v. Garnsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Let the costs be re-taxed ; the whole to be included in one bill, and but one taxation to be charged; the Clerk’s fees to be allowed and included in the bill, according to the rule in Boyce v. Thompson, (20 John. 274.) We allow bút one fee to the attorney, one fee to counsel, and one brief, one copy of costs, one notice of taxation, and one attendance, one service of rule, and one power to demand costs. It is true, that Jackson v. Keller was the case of a motion granted; but the principle is the same, whether the costs be on granting or denying the motion. If it be plain, in either case, that one set of affidavits is sufficient, no more should be allowed.
Rule accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Cow. 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-pioneer-v-garnsey-nysupct-1824.