Jackson ex dem. Norton v. Gardner

2 Cai. Cas. 95, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 359
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1804·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The affidavit is defective ; it does not set forth that there was no one in the office. The notice might have been slipped down without any intimation, and have remained there unobserved. To make such a service good, it ought to have been stated there was not any one in the office. The defendant can take nothing by his motion.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson ex dem. Norton v. Gardner, 2 Cai. Cas. 95, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 359 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).

2 Cai. Cas. 95 (Jackson ex dem. Norton v. Gardner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warner v. Teachenor
2 P. 717 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1884)