Jackson ex dem. Norton v. Gardner
2 Cai. Cas. 95, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 359
This text of 2 Cai. Cas. 95 (Jackson ex dem. Norton v. Gardner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jackson ex dem. Norton v. Gardner, 2 Cai. Cas. 95, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 359 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).
Opinion
The affidavit is defective ; it does not set forth that there was no one in the office. The notice might have been slipped down without any intimation, and have remained there unobserved. To make such a service good, it ought to have been stated there was not any one in the office. The defendant can take nothing by his motion.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Warner v. Teachenor
2 P. 717 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1884)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Cai. Cas. 95, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-norton-v-gardner-nysupct-1804.