Jackson ex dem. Newkirk v. Embler

14 Johns. 198
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1817·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The lessors of the plaintiff claim five eighths of the premises as heirs at law of Henry Newkirk, deceased ; •and the defendant claims under title derived from the will of Henry Newkirk, by which the premises are claimed as devised to his son James Newkirk. The words of the will are, “ I give, devise, and bequeath, to my son, James Newkirk, the two lots of land Nos. 5. and 6. in the last division of the five thousand acre tract, containing one hundred and forty acres.” James Newkirk died before the commencement of this suit; and the only question is, whether, under the above devise, he took a fee or only a life estate. A life estate only passed under this devise. There are no words of perpetuity, nor is there any thing in the will from which a fee, by implication, may be inferred. We are'accordingly of opinion, that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment for five eighths of the premises.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson ex dem. Newkirk v. Embler, 14 Johns. 198 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1817).

14 Johns. 198 (Jackson ex dem. Newkirk v. Embler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lummus v. Mitchell
34 N.H. 39 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1856)
Wilson v. Edmonds
24 N.H. 517 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1852)
Lippen v. Eldred
2 Barb. 130 (New York Supreme Court, 1848)
Sargent v. Towne
10 Mass. 308 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1813)