Jackson ex dem. Martin v. Platt

2 Johns. Cas. 71
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1800
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Johns. Cas. 71 (Jackson ex dem. Martin v. Platt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson ex dem. Martin v. Platt, 2 Johns. Cas. 71 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It was improper in the plaintiff’s attorney to refuse an inspection of the papers, or not to furnish sufficient extracts from them, to enable the defendant’s attorney to make the case. It is therefore ordered, that the defendant have time to make a case until eight days after the expiration of the present term, and that the plaintiff’s attorney furnish the papers required for that purpose, or suffer the defendant’s attorney to take sufficient extracts from the same, and that the proceedings in this cause remain in their present state, until the further order of the court.(

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hun v. Bowne
1 Cai. Cas. 23 (New York Supreme Court, 1803)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Johns. Cas. 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-martin-v-platt-nysupct-1800.