Jackson ex dem. Martin v. Platt
This text of 2 Johns. Cas. 71 (Jackson ex dem. Martin v. Platt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was improper in the plaintiff’s attorney to refuse an inspection of the papers, or not to furnish sufficient extracts from them, to enable the defendant’s attorney to make the case. It is therefore ordered, that the defendant have time to make a case until eight days after the expiration of the present term, and that the plaintiff’s attorney furnish the papers required for that purpose, or suffer the defendant’s attorney to take sufficient extracts from the same, and that the proceedings in this cause remain in their present state, until the further order of the court.(
(a) See 2 Grab. Frac. 2d ed. 331 ; and see note to Jackson, ex dem. Low v. Hornbeck, infra, 115.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Johns. Cas. 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-martin-v-platt-nysupct-1800.