Jackson ex dem. Mapes v. Frost

6 Johns. 135
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1810
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 6 Johns. 135 (Jackson ex dem. Mapes v. Frost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson ex dem. Mapes v. Frost, 6 Johns. 135 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The interest of Barton having been released before he was offered as a witness, his being implicated in the fraud, went only to his credit, and not to his competency. He was a competent witness to disprove as well as to prove the fraud. On this ground, we think a new trial ought to be granted, with costs to abide the event of the suit.

New trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robb v. Lefevre
7 Iowa 150 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1858)
Sims v. Killen
12 Ala. 497 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1847)
State v. Holloway
8 Blackf. 45 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1846)
Administrator of Seymour v. Beach
4 Vt. 493 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1832)
Baylor v. Smithers' heirs
11 Ky. 105 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1822)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Johns. 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-mapes-v-frost-nysupct-1810.