Jackson ex dem. Locksell v. Wheeler

6 Johns. 272
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1810·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We cannot distinguish this case from that of Jackson, ex dem. Livingston, v. Bryan. (1 Johns. Rep. 322.) The disclaimer of the present defendant dispensed with the necessity of notice to quit, but it was after the date of the demise. At the date of the- demise, the tenant in possession was not a trespasser, for there was then no determination of the estate, by notice to quit, or otherwise. His sale in fee to the defendant was subsequent. We are of opinion, therefore, that the plaintiff was properly nonsuited, for want of showing a complete right to the possession prior to the day of the demise. [274] That was essential. (Goodtitle v. Herbert, 4 Term Rep. 680.) The motion to set aside the nonsuit must be denied.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson ex dem. Locksell v. Wheeler, 6 Johns. 272 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

6 Johns. 272 (Jackson ex dem. Locksell v. Wheeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCarthy v. Brown
45 P. 14 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
Tobin v. Young
24 N.E. 121 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)
Smith v. Shaw
16 Cal. 88 (California Supreme Court, 1860)
Currier v. Perley
24 N.H. 219 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1851)
Bowman v. Wathen
3 F. Cas. 1076 (D. Indiana, 1841)
Costigan v. Wood
6 F. Cas. 612 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1838)
Jackson ex rel. Walsh v. Colden
4 Cow. 266 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)