Jackson ex dem. Livingston v. Thurston
3 Cow. 342
Opinion
It is so. The jury having decided contrary to evidence, the rule should have been, on payment of costs by the plaintiff. Such is the uniform practice. Let the rule be modified accordingly.
Rule modified.
Note. The order for setting aside the verdict, and that the costs abide the event, was entered at a previous term,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson ex dem. Livingston v. Thurston, 3 Cow. 342 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).
3 Cow. 342 (Jackson ex dem. Livingston v. Thurston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kummer v. Christopher & East Tenth Street Railroad
22 N.Y.S. 698 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1893)
Pennell v. Wilson
2 Abb. Pr. 466 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1864)
Ellsworth v. Gooding
8 How. Pr. 1 (New York Supreme Court, 1852)