Jackson ex dem. Livingston v. Niven

10 Johns. 335
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1813·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant, by the agreement, was to be entitled to a deed of the premises on the payment of certain moneys; but, in the mean time, he was put or continued in possession, and was to pay an annual rent, and the rent for one year at least, was paid and accepted. Whether the defendant would ever entitle himself to his deed was uncertain, but in the mean time he was a tenant, and paid rent as such, and was consequently entitled to notice to quit. The cases of Right v. Beard, (13 East, 209.) of Doe v. Watts, (7 Term Rep. 83.) and of Jackson v. Wilsey, (9 Johns. Rep. 267.) are much in point in favour of the right of the defendant to notice,

Judgment for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson ex dem. Livingston v. Niven, 10 Johns. 335 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1813).

10 Johns. 335 (Jackson ex dem. Livingston v. Niven) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ellis v. Jeans
7 Cal. 409 (California Supreme Court, 1857)
Moshier v. Reding
12 Me. 478 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1835)
Maynard's Lessee v. Cable
1 Wright 18 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1831)
Jackson ex dem. Church v. Miller
7 Cow. 747 (New York Supreme Court, 1827)
Campbell v. Bateman
2 Aik. 177 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1827)