Jackson ex dem. Lawe v. Virgil

3 Johns. 138
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1808
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Johns. 138 (Jackson ex dem. Lawe v. Virgil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson ex dem. Lawe v. Virgil, 3 Johns. 138 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The affidavit of service is not sufficient. It ought to appear, that the person who demanded the costs of the lessor of the plaintiff, showed his authority, to receive them, or how he was authorised by the defendant. Greater strictness is required to bring a,party into contempt, than in ordinary cases.

Rule refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Johns. 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-lawe-v-virgil-nysupct-1808.