Jackson ex dem. Kenyon v. Virgil
3 Johns. 540
Opinion
As the affidavit begins with the name of the party making it, and appears to have been duly sworn to before a proper magistrate, we think it sufficient. (3 Caines, 190. Haff v. Spicer and Potter.)
Rule granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson ex dem. Kenyon v. Virgil, 3 Johns. 540 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).
3 Johns. 540 (Jackson ex dem. Kenyon v. Virgil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Groton Bridge & Manufacturing Co. v. American Bridge Co.
137 F. 284 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York, 1905)
In re Bellah
116 F. 69 (D. Delaware, 1902)
Reeves v. Seitz
47 A.D. 267 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
Place v. City of Yonkers
43 A.D. 380 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
International Bank of St. Louis v. Faber
86 F. 443 (Second Circuit, 1898)
People v. Campbell
34 N.Y.S. 801 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
Simmons Hardware Co. v. Alturas Commercial Co.
39 P. 550 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1895)
People ex rel. Klinker v. Board of Police Com'rs
31 N.Y.S. 469 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)
Norton v. Hauge
50 N.W. 368 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1891)
Metcalf v. Prescott
10 Mont. 283 (Montana Supreme Court, 1891)
People Ex Rel. Kenyon v. . Sutherland
81 N.Y. 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 1880)
Wright v. Fallon
47 Wis. 488 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1879)
Weisbrod v. Marquardt
8 Abb. N. Cas. 243 (New York City Court, 1879)
Eddy v. Beal
34 Ind. 159 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1870)
In re Adams
1 F. Cas. 78 (S.D. New York, 1868)
Gill v. Ward
23 Ark. 16 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1861)
Millius v. Shafer
3 Denio 60 (New York Supreme Court, 1846)