Jackson ex. dem. Jackway v. Stiles
2 Cai. Cas. 368
This text of 2 Cai. Cas. 368 (Jackson ex. dem. Jackway v. Stiles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jackson ex. dem. Jackway v. Stiles, 2 Cai. Cas. 368 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).
Opinion
IT was ruled that if a perfon be admitted to defend on payment of cofts, and, after entering into the confent rule; ’ keep out or .the way to avoid being ferved with a copy of the Ca. fa. the cafual ejector, a rule will be granted to Ihew caufe, why an attachment ihould not go againft him, and that fervice of that rule, at the defendant’s houfe, ihalt be fufScient.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Cai. Cas. 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-jackway-v-stiles-nysupct-1805.