Jackson ex dem. Hull v. Babcock

4 Johns. 418
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1809·Published·Cited by 20 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The instrument of writing, given by Goodrich to Hitchcock, was a mere license, or personal privilege to inhabit; it conveyed no title to the premises. As soon as Hitchcock sold the premises to Cragie, it put an end to the privilege granted by Goodrich. The plaintiff is clearly entitled to recover.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson ex dem. Hull v. Babcock, 4 Johns. 418 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1809).

4 Johns. 418 (Jackson ex dem. Hull v. Babcock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Szadiwicz v. Cantor
154 N.E. 251 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1926)
Gunhouse v. . Fraenkel
105 N.E. 1086 (New York Court of Appeals, 1914)
Trustees of Caledonia County Grammar School v. Kent
84 A. 26 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1912)
Reeve v. Duryee
144 A.D. 647 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Stockham v. Borough Bill Posting Co.
144 A.D. 642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Bates v. Duncan
42 S.W. 410 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1897)
G.L. P.J.R.R. Co. v. . N.Y. G.L.R.R. Co.
31 N.E. 874 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
In re State Reservation at Niagara
16 Abb. N. Cas. 159 (New York Supreme Court, 1884)
Johnson v. Skillman
12 N.W. 149 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1882)
Potter v. Mercer
53 Cal. 667 (California Supreme Court, 1879)
Dark v. Johnston
55 Pa. 164 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1867)
Babcock v. Utter
1 Abb. Ct. App. 27 (New York Court of Appeals, 1864)
Still v. Trustees of the Village of Lansingburgh
16 Barb. 107 (New York Supreme Court, 1852)
Carleton v. Redington
21 N.H. 291 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1850)
Dolittle v. Eddy
7 Barb. 74 (New York Supreme Court, 1849)