Jackson ex dem. Hooker v. Young
5 Cow. 269
Opinion
The Court, without hearing Talcott, in reply, were clear that the statute was merely directory ; that the filing of a certificate was not a condition precedent to the giving of the deed, and passing the title; and that the sheriff’s omission should not prejudice the purchaser.
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson ex dem. Hooker v. Young, 5 Cow. 269 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1826).
5 Cow. 269 (Jackson ex dem. Hooker v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fowlkes v. City of Knoxville
9 Tenn. App. 391 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1929)
Davis v. Evans
73 S.W. 512 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1903)
Matter of Clark
61 N.E. 769 (New York Court of Appeals, 1901)
Wampler v. State ex rel. Alexander
38 L.R.A. 829 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1897)
Johnson v. Day
50 N.W. 701 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1891)
In re Taylor
11 N.Y.S. 189 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Nelms v. Vaughan
5 S.E. 704 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1888)
Vroman v. Thompson
16 N.W. 808 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1883)
Woolridge v. McKenna
8 F. 650 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1881)
Sackett v. State ex rel. Foreman
74 Ind. 486 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Taylor v. Gladwin
40 Mich. 232 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1879)
Stevenson v. Mayor of New York
3 Thomp. & Cook 133 (New York Supreme Court, 1874)
Rawson v. Van Riper
1 Thomp. & Cook 370 (New York Supreme Court, 1873)
Hill v. Wolfe
28 Iowa 577 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1870)
Buchanan v. Tracy
45 Mo. 437 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1870)
Brooks v. Tichner
1 Cal. Unrep. 104 (California Supreme Court, 1863)
Cunningham v. Cassidy
7 Abb. Pr. 183 (New York Court of Appeals, 1858)
Inhabitants of Veazie v. Mayo
45 Me. 560 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1858)
St. Louis County Court v. Sparks
10 Mo. 117 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1846)