Jackson ex dem. Fitzsimmons v. Fitzsimmons
6 Wend. 546
Opinion
By the Court,
The practice here, in a case like this, does not appear to be settled. According to the practice of the K. B. in England, when there is a verdict found for either party, subject to the opinion of the court above on a case made, the postea is stayed in the hands of the officer of nisi prius till the question is determined, and the [547]*547verdict is then entered for the plaintiff or defendant, as the case may happen, 2 Tidd, 808, and such must be the practice here. The motion is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson ex dem. Fitzsimmons v. Fitzsimmons, 6 Wend. 546 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1831).
6 Wend. 546 (Jackson ex dem. Fitzsimmons v. Fitzsimmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'Brien v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
176 Misc. 404 (New York Supreme Court, 1941)
Chittenden v. Empire Stone-Dressing Co.
6 Duer 30 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1856)
Crittenden v. Empire Stone Dressing Co.
3 Abb. Pr. 71 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1856)