Jackson ex dem' Fisher v. Ferguson

3 Cai. Cas. 127, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 467
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1805
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Cai. Cas. 127 (Jackson ex dem' Fisher v. Ferguson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson ex dem' Fisher v. Ferguson, 3 Cai. Cas. 127, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 467 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

Opinion

Per curiam.

To entitle to such a favour, some reason should be offered, evincing why the affidavit could not be prepared; because the period of service ordered by the rules of the court, is otherwise presumed sufficient to enable the party to be ready. The effect of the motion cannot, therefore, be delayed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cai. Cas. 127, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-fisher-v-ferguson-nysupct-1805.