Jackson ex dem. Erving v. Bushnell

13 Johns. 330
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1816
StatusPublished

This text of 13 Johns. 330 (Jackson ex dem. Erving v. Bushnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson ex dem. Erving v. Bushnell, 13 Johns. 330 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1816).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This motion must he denied. The defendant comes too late, after verdict, to ask for security for costs. Had the application been made before trial, the court would have ordered the proceedings stayed until security for costs was filed. But we can find no practice to warrant us in directing it to be done in this stage of the cause, nunc pro tunc.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Johns. 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-erving-v-bushnell-nysupct-1816.