Jackson ex dem. Davy v. De Walts

7 Johns. 157
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1810·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The widow must be considered as entering as guardian, in socage, to her infant son, the lessor of the plaintiff. This is the legal intendment, especially as there was no act or declaration of the wife, inconsistent with that character. (1 Johns. Rep. 163.) The plaintiff showed title, and the defendant having-entered under that title, and with permission of the guardian of the plaintiff, cannot be permitted to set up [159]*159a title in a third person, in contradiction to the title under which he entered. (4 Johns. Rep. 210.) The motion to set aside the verdict must be denied.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson ex dem. Davy v. De Walts, 7 Johns. 157 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

7 Johns. 157 (Jackson ex dem. Davy v. De Walts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Application of Mary E. Hynes
12 N.E. 60 (New York Court of Appeals, 1887)
Sylvester v. Ralston
31 Barb. 286 (New York Supreme Court, 1859)
Tufts v. Tufts
24 F. Cas. 288 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1847)
Anderson v. Darby
10 S.C.L. 369 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1818)