Jackson ex dem. Davy v. De Walts

7 Johns. 157
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1810
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 7 Johns. 157 (Jackson ex dem. Davy v. De Walts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson ex dem. Davy v. De Walts, 7 Johns. 157 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The widow must be considered as entering as guardian, in socage, to her infant son, the lessor of the plaintiff. This is the legal intendment, especially as there was no act or declaration of the wife, inconsistent with that character. (1 Johns. Rep. 163.) The plaintiff showed title, and the defendant having-entered under that title, and with permission of the guardian of the plaintiff, cannot be permitted to set up [159]*159a title in a third person, in contradiction to the title under which he entered. (4 Johns. Rep. 210.) The motion to set aside the verdict must be denied.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Application of Mary E. Hynes
12 N.E. 60 (New York Court of Appeals, 1887)
Sylvester v. Ralston
31 Barb. 286 (New York Supreme Court, 1859)
Tufts v. Tufts
24 F. Cas. 288 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1847)
Anderson v. Darby
10 S.C.L. 369 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1818)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Johns. 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-davy-v-de-walts-nysupct-1810.