Jackson ex dem. Culverhouse v. Beach

1 Johns. Cas. 399
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 15, 1800·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It does not lie with the defendant to object to the alienism of the lessor of the plaintiff; for the interest granted to Culverhouse was not forfeited, so as to vest the title in the people of the state, until after office found ; "(Co. 53, Page's case ; Powell on Devises, 317; 7 T. R. 398; 1 Bac. Abr. 81, 133 ;) and until then, he was competent to hold the land against third persons. Even if the defendant could make this objection, yet the lessor of the plaintiff having been naturalized, that naturalization has a retroactive effect, so as to be deemed a waiver of all liability to forfeiture, and a confirmation of his former title.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson ex dem. Culverhouse v. Beach, 1 Johns. Cas. 399 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

1 Johns. Cas. 399 (Jackson ex dem. Culverhouse v. Beach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bogan v. Edinburgh American Land Mortg. Co.
63 F. 192 (Eighth Circuit, 1894)
Manuel v. Wulff
152 U.S. 505 (Supreme Court, 1894)