Jackson ex dem' Cramer v. Stiles
3 Cai. Cas. 140, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 483
This text of 3 Cai. Cas. 140 (Jackson ex dem' Cramer v. Stiles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jackson ex dem' Cramer v. Stiles, 3 Cai. Cas. 140, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 483 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).
Opinion
ON motion for an attachment for not paying costs, on account of the plaintiff’s being nonsuited, for want of confessing lease entry and ouster, the affidavit must state, that the person demanding them of the tenant, was duly au-thorised by the lessor of the plaintiff, according to the English practice.
Run. Eject. 415.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Cai. Cas. 140, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-cramer-v-stiles-nysupct-1805.