Jackson ex dem. Colden v. Chace

15 Johns. 354
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1818·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A motion for a new trial must be within the first four days of the term, and before judgment is perfected, unless an order to stay proceedings on the verdict has been obtained, which operates as an enlargement of the rule of four days. In no case has a motion for a new trial been heard, after a judgment has been regularly perfected. The case of Shepherd arose soon after the presént rules and orders of the court were made, and the court, under the particular circumstances of the case, of an-alleged misapprehension of the meaning of the 4th rule of January term, 1799', allowed the motion to be made.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson ex dem. Colden v. Chace, 15 Johns. 354 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1818).

15 Johns. 354 (Jackson ex dem. Colden v. Chace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

La Vetra v. Fraternal Club Sicania, Inc.
128 Misc. 670 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1926)
Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. City of Jamestown
114 Misc. 689 (New York Supreme Court, 1921)
Coy v. Martin
24 Misc. 211 (New York Supreme Court, 1898)
Miller v. . Zeimer
18 N.E. 716 (New York Court of Appeals, 1888)
Fisher v. Corwin
42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 253 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)
Conklin v. Hinds
16 Minn. 457 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1871)
Stilwell v. Staples
4 Rob. 639 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1866)
Tucker v. White
28 How. Pr. 78 (New York Supreme Court, 1862)