Jackson ex dem. Clowes v. Hakes
2 Cai. Cas. 335
Opinion
Take the effect of your motion with costs. It is absurd to sustain a suit in such ’a case. It is against the whole theory of the action. The proceedings, are an absolute nullity.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson ex dem. Clowes v. Hakes, 2 Cai. Cas. 335 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).
2 Cai. Cas. 335 (Jackson ex dem. Clowes v. Hakes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stuyvesant v. Grissler
12 Abb. Pr. 6 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1868)
Redfield v. Utica & Syracuse Rail Road
25 Barb. 54 (New York Supreme Court, 1851)
People v. Van Rensselaer
8 Barb. 189 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)