Jackson ex dem. Clowes v. Hakes
2 Cai. Cas. 335
This text of 2 Cai. Cas. 335 (Jackson ex dem. Clowes v. Hakes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jackson ex dem. Clowes v. Hakes, 2 Cai. Cas. 335 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).
Opinion
Take the effect of your motion with costs. It is absurd to sustain a suit in such ’a case. It is against the whole theory of the action. The proceedings, are an absolute nullity.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stuyvesant v. Grissler
12 Abb. Pr. 6 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1868)
Redfield v. Utica & Syracuse Rail Road
25 Barb. 54 (New York Supreme Court, 1851)
People v. Van Rensselaer
8 Barb. 189 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Cai. Cas. 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-clowes-v-hakes-nysupct-1805.