Jackson ex dem. Butler v. Ditz

1 Johns. Cas. 392
New York Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1800·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence of the death of Butler is sufficient, prima facie to put the burden of proof upon the plaintiff, to show that he is alive, and as he has not done so, we are of opinion, that the demises by Butler should be struck out of the declaration. Both the time and manner of the application are proper.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson ex dem. Butler v. Ditz, 1 Johns. Cas. 392 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

1 Johns. Cas. 392 (Jackson ex dem. Butler v. Ditz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coleman v. Doe
3 Ill. 251 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1840)
Bogart v. M'Donald
2 Johns. Cas. 219 (New York Supreme Court, 1801)