Jackson ex dem. Bleecker v. Wiseburn

5 Wend. 136
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 9, 1830
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 5 Wend. 136 (Jackson ex dem. Bleecker v. Wiseburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson ex dem. Bleecker v. Wiseburn, 5 Wend. 136 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).

Opinion

By the Court,

Marcy, J.

By the provisions of the revised statutes, a defendant in error has 20 days after notice of a bond executed on the suing out of a writ of error to ex-[137]*137eept to the sureties; and if such sureties do not justify within ten days after notice of such exceptions served on the plaintiff in error, the writ of error may be superseded by the order of any officer authorized to allow the same. 2 R. S. 597, 8, § 34, 35, 36. It is the ordinary course of the court to enlarge the lime to plead, or other time prescribed for any other purpose.by the rules or practice of the court upon cause shewn; but neither a commissioner in vacation nor the court in term can enlarge the lime within which an act is tobe done, when such time is regulated by statute. The rules and practice of the court being established by the court, may be made to yield to circumstance, to promote the ends of justice. Not so as to a statute; it is unbending, requiring implicit obedience as well from the court as from its suitors. The court possesses no dispensing power, and the judge did right to vacate the order made by him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehigh Valley Railroad v. Krapf 's Truck Service
56 Pa. D. & C.2d 259 (Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas, 1971)
Klugman v. Gimbel Bros.
182 A.2d 223 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1962)
McTavish v. McTavish
6 Misc. 2d 685 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Dowd v. Corcoran
7 Misc. 2d 837 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1957)
Shuey v. State of Michigan
106 F. Supp. 32 (E.D. Michigan, 1952)
Weingarten v. Cohen
275 A.D.2d 253 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Arnold v. Mayal Realty Co.
85 N.E.2d 616 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)
Arnold v. Mayal Realty Co.
274 A.D. 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
Jung v. City of New York
6 Misc. 2d 200 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)
People Ex Rel. Northchester Corp. v. Miller
42 N.E.2d 469 (New York Court of Appeals, 1942)
In re South Philadelphia Merchants' B. & L. Ass'n
27 Pa. D. & C. 472 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1936)
Crawford's License
33 Pa. Super. 338 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)
Harris v. Mercur
51 A. 969 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)
Walsh v. Schulz
67 How. Pr. 173 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1884)
Dawson v. Shillock
12 N.W. 526 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1882)
Woolridge v. McKenna
8 F. 650 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1881)
Wait v. . Van Allen
22 N.Y. 319 (New York Court of Appeals, 1860)
Clark v. Bowers
2 Wis. 123 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1853)
Seymour v. . Judd
2 N.Y. 464 (New York Court of Appeals, 1849)
Allen v. Ackley
4 How. Pr. 5 (New York Supreme Court, 1849)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Wend. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-bleecker-v-wiseburn-nysupct-1830.