Jackson ex dem. Barhydt v. Clow

New York Supreme Court

Jackson ex dem. Barhydt v. Clow

13 Johns. 157

DecidedJanuary 15, 1816

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Johns. 157 (Jackson ex dem. Barhydt v. Clow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson ex dem. Barhydt v. Clow, 13 Johns. 157 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1816).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plea of puis darrein continuance was put in in proper time; and the only question is, whether the defendant was bound to serve a copy of it at the time. Where the matter of the plea arises so as to render it necessary that the plea should be filed in term time, a copy of it must be served; but where the matter arises in vacation, so that the plea can only be offered at the circuit, in order to prevent a trial, a copy need not be served.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plea of puis darrein continuance was put in in proper time; and the only question is, whether the defendant was bound to serve a copy of it at the time. Where the matter of the plea arises so as to render it necessary that the plea should be filed in term time, a copy of it must be served; but where the matter arises in vacation, so that the plea can only be offered at the circuit, in order to prevent a trial, a copy need not be served.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Johns. 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-barhydt-v-clow-nysupct-1816.