Jackson ex dem. Allen v. Bell

19 Johns. 168
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1821·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are not satisfied that the defendan't has Shown a sufficient excuse for :not -pleading the rél'é'asé before ; but as we see no-equity or justice in the plea, We deny the‘motion;

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson ex dem. Allen v. Bell, 19 Johns. 168 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1821).

19 Johns. 168 (Jackson ex dem. Allen v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson ex dem. De Forest v. Ramsay
3 Cow. 75 (New York Supreme Court, 1824)