Jackson ex dem. Aikins v. Bankcraft

New York Supreme Court

Jackson ex dem. Aikins v. Bankcraft

3 Johns. 259

DecidedMay 15, 1808

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Johns. 259 (Jackson ex dem. Aikins v. Bankcraft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson ex dem. Aikins v. Bankcraft, 3 Johns. 259 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The rule for a commission must be denied ; but we grant the rule to strike out the name of Rogers, one of the lessors of the plaintiff. The practice of inserting the names of persons as lessors of the plaintiff in ejectment, unnecessarily, is often abused, and ought to be restrained. And, considering the remote situation of the attorney of the plaintiff, we grant him leave until the next term, to produce a further affidavit as to Aikins.

Rule refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The rule for a commission must be denied ; but we grant the rule to strike out the name of Rogers, one of the lessors of the plaintiff. The practice of inserting the names of persons as lessors of the plaintiff in ejectment, unnecessarily, is often abused, and ought to be restrained. And, considering the remote situation of the attorney of the plaintiff, we grant him leave until the next term, to produce a further affidavit as to Aikins.

Rule refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Johns. 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-aikins-v-bankcraft-nysupct-1808.