Jackson Electric Membership Corp. v. Mathews

Supreme Court of Georgia

Jackson Electric Membership Corp. v. Mathews

78 S.E.2d 514, 210 Ga. 171, 1953 Ga. LEXIS 530

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 13, 1953

Docket18333

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 78 S.E.2d 514 (Jackson Electric Membership Corp. v. Mathews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson Electric Membership Corp. v. Mathews, 78 S.E.2d 514, 210 Ga. 171, 1953 Ga. LEXIS 530 (Ga. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Hawkins, Justice.

A petition for mandamus wás filed in Jackson Superior Court by Mr. and Mrs. T. J. Mathews against Jackson Electric Membership Corporation, seeking to compel the construction of an electric line to their home. To the petition as amended a general demurrer was filed, and the exception here is to the overruling of the demurrer. Held: “The only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions being to a judgment overruling the defendant’s demurrer to a petition for mandamus, the bill of exceptions is prematurely brought and must be dismissed.” Ledford v. McConnell, 200 Ga. 38 (36 S. E. 2d 102). See also Bridges v. Poole, 176 Ga. 500 (168 S. E. 577); Nichols v. Hampton, 198 Ga. 327 (31 S. E. 2d 659); Code (Ann. Supp.) § 64-110.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hawkins, Justice.

A petition for mandamus wás filed in Jackson Superior Court by Mr. and Mrs. T. J. Mathews against Jackson Electric Membership Corporation, seeking to compel the construction of an electric line to their home. To the petition as amended a general demurrer was filed, and the exception here is to the overruling of the demurrer. Held: “The only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions being to a judgment overruling the defendant’s demurrer to a petition for mandamus, the bill of exceptions is prematurely brought and must be dismissed.” Ledford v. McConnell, 200 Ga. 38 (36 S. E. 2d 102). See also Bridges v. Poole, 176 Ga. 500 (168 S. E. 577); Nichols v. Hampton, 198 Ga. 327 (31 S. E. 2d 659); Code (Ann. Supp.) § 64-110.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 S.E.2d 514, 210 Ga. 171, 1953 Ga. LEXIS 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-electric-membership-corp-v-mathews-ga-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack