Jackson Discount Co. v. Merck
This text of 173 S.E. 647 (Jackson Discount Co. v. Merck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction will only be set aside by a decree in equity for fraud, accident, or mistake, or tbe acts of the adverse party, unmixed with the negligence or fault of the petitioner. Civil Code (1910), §§ 4584, 5965. Ehrlich v. Bell, 163 Ga. 547 (2 a) (136 S. E. 423). See also Lanier v. Nunnally, 128 Ga. 358 (57 S. E. 689); Scarborough v. Information Buying Co., 170 Ga. 872 (154 S. E. 350). Under the pleadings and the evidence the judge did not err in refusing to set aside the verdict and judgment, or in refusal of an injunction. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 S.E. 647, 178 Ga. 660, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-discount-co-v-merck-ga-1934.