Jackson Discount Co. v. Merck

173 S.E. 647, 178 Ga. 660, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 125
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 13, 1934·No. No. 9891·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

A judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction will only be set aside by a decree in equity for fraud, accident, or mistake, or tbe acts of the adverse party, unmixed with the negligence or fault of the petitioner. Civil Code (1910), §§ 4584, 5965. Ehrlich v. Bell, 163 Ga. 547 (2 a) (136 S. E. 423). See also Lanier v. Nunnally, 128 Ga. 358 (57 S. E. 689); Scarborough v. Information Buying Co., 170 Ga. 872 (154 S. E. 350). Under the pleadings and the evidence the judge did not err in refusing to set aside the verdict and judgment, or in refusal of an injunction. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Borough, Hope <& Fox, for plaintiff. B. W. Smith Jr., for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson Discount Co. v. Merck, 173 S.E. 647, 178 Ga. 660, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 125 (Ga. 1934).

173 S.E. 647 (Jackson Discount Co. v. Merck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hurt Building Inc. v. Atlanta Trust Co.
182 S.E. 187 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)