Jackson Discount Co. v. Merck

173 S.E. 647, 178 Ga. 660, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 125
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 13, 1934
DocketNo. 9891
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 173 S.E. 647 (Jackson Discount Co. v. Merck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson Discount Co. v. Merck, 173 S.E. 647, 178 Ga. 660, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 125 (Ga. 1934).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

A judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction will only be set aside by a decree in equity for fraud, accident, or mistake, or tbe acts of the adverse party, unmixed with the negligence or fault of the petitioner. Civil Code (1910), §§ 4584, 5965. Ehrlich v. Bell, 163 Ga. 547 (2 a) (136 S. E. 423). See also Lanier v. Nunnally, 128 Ga. 358 (57 S. E. 689); Scarborough v. Information Buying Co., 170 Ga. 872 (154 S. E. 350). Under the pleadings and the evidence the judge did not err in refusing to set aside the verdict and judgment, or in refusal of an injunction. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Borough, Hope <& Fox, for plaintiff. B. W. Smith Jr., for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hurt Building Inc. v. Atlanta Trust Co.
182 S.E. 187 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 S.E. 647, 178 Ga. 660, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-discount-co-v-merck-ga-1934.