Jackson (Cliff) v. State

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJune 11, 2014
Docket65039
StatusUnpublished

This text of Jackson (Cliff) v. State (Jackson (Cliff) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson (Cliff) v. State, (Neb. 2014).

Opinion

that the remittitur date is the date that remittitur is issued, not when the district court clerk files the remittitur. Gonzales v. State, 118 Nev. 590, 593, 53 P.3d 901, 902 (2002). Because appellant's petition was untimely and he failed to demonstrate good cause, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the petition as procedurally barred. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

J. Pickering

Parraguirre

(jag, Saitta

cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge Cliff Stevenson Jackson Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A ceVrra

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gonzales v. State
53 P.3d 901 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jackson (Cliff) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-cliff-v-state-nev-2014.