Jackson-Bey v. Correctional Medical Services

118 F. App'x 781
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 11, 2005
DocketNo. 04-6144
StatusPublished

This text of 118 F. App'x 781 (Jackson-Bey v. Correctional Medical Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson-Bey v. Correctional Medical Services, 118 F. App'x 781 (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Renaldo Jackson-Bey, a Maryland prisoner, seeks to appeal from the district court’s order denying his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. Because Jackson-Bey’s notice of appeal was filed outside the thirty-day appeal period set forth in Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), and the district court concluded on remand that Jackson-Bey failed to demonstrate excusable neglect or good cause for the late filing, we lack jurisdiction over Jackson-Bey’s ap[782]*782peal. See Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (stating the appeal periods established by Rule 4 are mandatory and jurisdictional). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as untimely. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.
434 U.S. 257 (Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 F. App'x 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-bey-v-correctional-medical-services-ca4-2005.