Jackson Banking Co. v. Maddox

56 S.E. 119, 127 Ga. 96, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 749
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 12, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 56 S.E. 119 (Jackson Banking Co. v. Maddox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson Banking Co. v. Maddox, 56 S.E. 119, 127 Ga. 96, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 749 (Ga. 1906).

Opinion

Cobb, P. J.

A bill of exceptions in which there is no attempt to assign error upon a judgment rendered by the court without the intervention of' a jury, except to state the contents of the judgment and follow the same with a statement that plaintiff in error comes “within less than thirty days from the said judgment and excepts to the same and assigns the same as error,” does not comply with the statutory requirement that alleged errors shall be plainly and, distinctly pointed out. Wheeler v. Worley, 110 Ga. 518; Neal Loan & Bkg. Co. v. Wright, 116 Ga. 395, and eases cited. Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Georgia Minerals Co. v. Tatum
127 S.E. 655 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)
Holland v. Holland
92 S.E. 538 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 S.E. 119, 127 Ga. 96, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-banking-co-v-maddox-ga-1906.