Jackson and Shine v. State
This text of 21 S.W.2d 298 (Jackson and Shine v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The offense is tampering with 'an automobile ; the punishment confinement in jail for sixty days.
Appellants entered into a joint recognizance. A joint recognizance on appeal will not confer jurisdiction on this court. Our decisions are to the effect that each appellant must give a separate recognizance. Branch’s Annotated Penal Code of Texas, sec. 614. Irvin v. State, 32 S. W. 899; Bowers v. State, 33 S. W. 974; Goldman v. State, 34 S. W. 122; McMeans v. State, 38 S. W. 998; Hodges v. State, 38 S. W. 1019; Hogg v. State, 48 S. W. 580; Haverbekken et al. v. State, 200 S. W. 524.
Appellants are granted fifteen days from this date in which to perfect their appeal.
The appeal is dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
*428 The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 S.W.2d 298, 113 Tex. Crim. 427, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-and-shine-v-state-texcrimapp-1929.