Jackson and Coker Locum Tenens, Inc. v. Paul Slawek, M.D., Rittenhouse Diagnostic Associates, Inc
This text of 61 F.3d 895 (Jackson and Coker Locum Tenens, Inc. v. Paul Slawek, M.D., Rittenhouse Diagnostic Associates, Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
61 F.3d 895
Jackson and Coker Locum Tenens, Inc.
v.
Paul Slawek, M.D., Rittenhouse Diagnostic Associates, Inc.
NOS. 94-1601, 94-1784
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
June 08, 1995
Appeal From: E.D.Pa., No. 93-cv-06459
VACATED.
Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated by judgment orders, unpublished per curiam opinions and unpublished signed opinions, indicating the disposition of each case, transmitted by the Court. Third Circuit Rules, App. 1, Internal Operating Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 F.3d 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-and-coker-locum-tenens-inc-v-paul-slawek-m-ca3-1995.