Jacks v. Moore

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Jacks v. Moore

1 Yeates 391

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedSeptember 15, 1794

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1 Yeates 391 (Jacks v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacks v. Moore, 1 Yeates 391 (Pa. 1794).

Pincite

Opinion

Per cur.

If the defendant had pleaded the set-off specially, he would have been under no necessity to have given any other written notice. It would then have been incumbent on the plaintiff to have replied the statute of limitations. Here the set*off is not pleaded; and under the case cited, r*oqo the evidence may be well objected to, on the mere notice of set-off. Evidence overruled.

Cited and followed in 8 Watts, 264, and 57 Pa., 157. Verdict pro quer. for 107I. 7s. 5d. debt, and 6d. costs. Mr. Montgomery, pro qtier. Mr. Hopkins, pro def.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per cur.

If the defendant had pleaded the set-off specially, he would have been under no necessity to have given any other written notice. It would then have been incumbent on the plaintiff to have replied the statute of limitations. Here the set*off is not pleaded; and under the case cited, r*oqo the evidence may be well objected to, on the mere notice of set-off. Evidence overruled.

Cited and followed in 8 Watts, 264, and 57 Pa., 157. Verdict pro quer. for 107I. 7s. 5d. debt, and 6d. costs. Mr. Montgomery, pro qtier. Mr. Hopkins, pro def.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Yeates 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacks-v-moore-pa-1794.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack