Jackman v. Vanderbilt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jackman v. Vanderbilt

230 A.D. 717

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 230 A.D. 717 (Jackman v. Vanderbilt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackman v. Vanderbilt, 230 A.D. 717 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law, [718]*718with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. We are of opinion that the driver of the automobile was not an employee of the appellants at the time of the accident. In view of this disposition of the case, the appeal from the order denying motion for a new trial is dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur; Rich, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed upon the law, [718]*718with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. We are of opinion that the driver of the automobile was not an employee of the appellants at the time of the accident. In view of this disposition of the case, the appeal from the order denying motion for a new trial is dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur; Rich, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 A.D. 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackman-v-vanderbilt-nyappdiv-1930.