Jackman v. Eastman

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Jackman v. Eastman

62 N.H. 273

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedJune 5, 1882

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 62 N.H. 273 (Jackman v. Eastman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackman v. Eastman, 62 N.H. 273 (N.H. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Clark, J.

The condition of the bond issued under the 36th rule in chancery is, “ to pay and satisfy all such damages as may be occasioned to the adverse party by reason of the injunction.” What damages were occasioned to the plaintiffs by reason of the injunction, is a question of fact to be determined at the trial term. We cannot say as matter of law what damages were so occasioned.

Case discharged.

Blodgett and Carpenter, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark, J.

The condition of the bond issued under the 36th rule in chancery is, “ to pay and satisfy all such damages as may be occasioned to the adverse party by reason of the injunction.” What damages were occasioned to the plaintiffs by reason of the injunction, is a question of fact to be determined at the trial term. We cannot say as matter of law what damages were so occasioned.

Case discharged.

Blodgett and Carpenter, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 N.H. 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackman-v-eastman-nh-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack