Jackman v. Eastman
62 N.H. 273
Opinion
The condition of the bond issued under the 36th rule in chancery is, “ to pay and satisfy all such damages as may be occasioned to the adverse party by reason of the injunction.” What damages were occasioned to the plaintiffs by reason of the injunction, is a question of fact to be determined at the trial term. We cannot say as matter of law what damages were so occasioned.
Case discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackman v. Eastman, 62 N.H. 273 (N.H. 1882).
62 N.H. 273 (Jackman v. Eastman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carpenter v. Fisher A.
38 A. 211 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1896)