Jackiw, J. v. Soft Pretzel Franchise (WCAB)
This text of Jackiw, J. v. Soft Pretzel Franchise (WCAB) (Jackiw, J. v. Soft Pretzel Franchise (WCAB)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
JENNIFER JACKIW, : No. 286 EAL 2023 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court : : SOFT PRETZEL FRANCHISE (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD), : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Did the Commonwealth Court err in applying Section 306(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act, 77 P.S. § 511, rather than Section 306(c), 77 P.S. § 513, to determine the benefit rate for the specific loss of a body part, based upon its decision in Walton v. Cooper Hosiery Co., 409 A.2d 518 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1980)?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jackiw, J. v. Soft Pretzel Franchise (WCAB), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackiw-j-v-soft-pretzel-franchise-wcab-pa-2024.