Jackiewicz v. Mallick

138 A. 627, 126 Me. 602, 1927 Me. LEXIS 113
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedSeptember 29, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 138 A. 627 (Jackiewicz v. Mallick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackiewicz v. Mallick, 138 A. 627, 126 Me. 602, 1927 Me. LEXIS 113 (Me. 1927).

Opinion

An action for money loaned. A jury found for the plaintiff upon, conflicting evidence composed mainly of the testimony of the two parties. The jury passed upon the credibility of the witnesses and the weight of such corroborating evidence as was offered on both sides. To set aside the finding of the jury on these questions would be taking from the jury questions peculiarly within their province. There being nothing so inherently improbable in the plaintiff’s testimony as to render it incredible, this Court can not say that a jury that heard and saw the witnesses manifestly erred in assigning greater weight to the evidence of the plaintiff and the sustaining witnesses than to that of the defendant. Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Colby v. Jesse Tarr & Depositors Trust Co.
43 A.2d 299 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 A. 627, 126 Me. 602, 1927 Me. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackiewicz-v-mallick-me-1927.