Jackie Ray Smith v. John H. Shumate, Attorney, and W. Robert Abbot, Judge of Fayette County Circuit Court

Fourth Circuit

Jackie Ray Smith v. John H. Shumate, Attorney, and W. Robert Abbot, Judge of Fayette County Circuit Court

48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11051, 1995 WL 88905

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 6, 1995

Docket94-6930

StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1217 (Jackie Ray Smith v. John H. Shumate, Attorney, and W. Robert Abbot, Judge of Fayette County Circuit Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackie Ray Smith v. John H. Shumate, Attorney, and W. Robert Abbot, Judge of Fayette County Circuit Court, 48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11051, 1995 WL 88905 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

48 F.3d 1217
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Jackie Ray SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John H. SHUMATE, Attorney, Defendant-Appellee,
and
W. Robert Abbot, Judge of Fayette County Circuit Court, Defendant.

No. 94-6930.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 6, 1995.

Jackie Ray Smith, Appellant pro se.

John H. Shumate, Appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Shumate, No. 93-0035-C (N.D.W.V. July 18, 1994). We deny Smith's motion for appointment of counsel on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

48 F.3d 1217
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Jackie Ray SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John H. SHUMATE, Attorney, Defendant-Appellee,
and
W. Robert Abbot, Judge of Fayette County Circuit Court, Defendant.

No. 94-6930.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 6, 1995.

Jackie Ray Smith, Appellant pro se.

John H. Shumate, Appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Shumate, No. 93-0035-C (N.D.W.V. July 18, 1994). We deny Smith's motion for appointment of counsel on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11051, 1995 WL 88905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackie-ray-smith-v-john-h-shumate-attorney-and-w-r-ca4-1995.