Jackie D. Dill and Vergie Erlene Dill v. T.C. Investments, II, LLC, Successor to the Small Business Administration

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 6, 2003
Docket07-03-00283-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jackie D. Dill and Vergie Erlene Dill v. T.C. Investments, II, LLC, Successor to the Small Business Administration (Jackie D. Dill and Vergie Erlene Dill v. T.C. Investments, II, LLC, Successor to the Small Business Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackie D. Dill and Vergie Erlene Dill v. T.C. Investments, II, LLC, Successor to the Small Business Administration, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

NO. 07-03-0283-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

OCTOBER 6, 2003

______________________________

JACKIE D. DILL AND VERGIE ERLENE DILL, APPELLANTS

V.

T.C. INVESTMENTS, II, L.L.C., SUCCESSOR

TO THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 237TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 02-516,522; HONORABLE SAM MEDINA, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants Jackie D. Dill and Vergie Erlene Dill filed a notice of appeal challenging the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of appellee T.C. Investments, II, L.L.C., Successor to the Small Business Administration.  The clerk’s record has been filed.  Appellants’ brief was due to be filed on or before August 11, 2003, but has yet to be filed, and no motion for extension of time was filed.  By letter dated September 9, 2003, this Court notified appellants’ counsel, J.A. “Trey” Didway, of the defect and also directed him to reasonably explain the failure to file a brief together with a showing that appellee has not been significantly injured by the delay on or before September 19, 2003.  Counsel did not respond and the brief remains outstanding.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and failure to comply with an order of this Court.   See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b) and (c).

Don H. Reavis

   Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jackie D. Dill and Vergie Erlene Dill v. T.C. Investments, II, LLC, Successor to the Small Business Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackie-d-dill-and-vergie-erlene-dill-v-tc-investme-texapp-2003.