Jack Wingfield v. United States

239 F.2d 643

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided November 16, 1956·No. 5488_1·Published

Opinion

239 F.2d 643

Jack WINGFIELD
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 5488.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

November 16, 1956.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma.

Anthis & Gotcher, Muskogee, Okl., for appellant.

Frank D. McSherry, U. S. Atty., Harry G. Fender, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Paul M. Brewer, Asst. U. S. Atty., Muskogee, Okl., for appellee.

Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute the same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

239 F.2d 643

Jack WINGFIELD
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 5488.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

November 16, 1956.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma.

Anthis & Gotcher, Muskogee, Okl., for appellant.

Frank D. McSherry, U. S. Atty., Harry G. Fender, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Paul M. Brewer, Asst. U. S. Atty., Muskogee, Okl., for appellee.

Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute the same.

Jack Wingfield v. United States, 239 F.2d 643 (10th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

239 F.2d 643 (Jack Wingfield v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.