Jack Wingfield v. United States

Tenth Circuit

Jack Wingfield v. United States

239 F.2d 643

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedNovember 16, 1956

Docket5488_1

StatusPublished

This text of 239 F.2d 643 (Jack Wingfield v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jack Wingfield v. United States, 239 F.2d 643 (10th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

239 F.2d 643

Jack WINGFIELD
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 5488.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

November 16, 1956.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma.

Anthis & Gotcher, Muskogee, Okl., for appellant.

Frank D. McSherry, U. S. Atty., Harry G. Fender, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Paul M. Brewer, Asst. U. S. Atty., Muskogee, Okl., for appellee.

Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute the same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

239 F.2d 643

Jack WINGFIELD
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 5488.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

November 16, 1956.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma.

Anthis & Gotcher, Muskogee, Okl., for appellant.

Frank D. McSherry, U. S. Atty., Harry G. Fender, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Paul M. Brewer, Asst. U. S. Atty., Muskogee, Okl., for appellee.

Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute the same.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 F.2d 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-wingfield-v-united-states-ca10-1956.