Jack Wayne Friend v. Ronald Kolodzieczak
992 F.2d 243, 93 Daily Journal DAR 6255, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3634, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 11358, 1993 WL 158469
Opinion
ORDER
The Supreme Court granted the petition for writ of certiorari, vacated the judgment, and then remanded this cáse to this court for further consideration, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1038, 122 L.Ed.2d 348, in light of Farrar v. Hobby, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 566, 121 L.Ed.2d 494 (1992).
This court now remands the matter to the district court to re-examine its determination of the reasonableness of the attorneys’ fee award in light of the Farrar v. Hobby decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jack Wayne Friend v. Ronald Kolodzieczak, 992 F.2d 243, 93 Daily Journal DAR 6255, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3634, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 11358, 1993 WL 158469 (9th Cir. 1993).
992 F.2d 243 (Jack Wayne Friend v. Ronald Kolodzieczak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jack W. Friend v. Ronald Kolodzieczak
72 F.3d 1386 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7360, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,573, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 16,919 Jack W. Friend v. Ronald Kolodzieczak
65 F.3d 1514 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Friend v. Kolodzieczak
65 F.3d 1514 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)