Jack Wayne Friend v. Ronald Kolodzieczak

992 F.2d 243, 93 Daily Journal DAR 6255, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3634, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 11358, 1993 WL 158469
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 18, 1993
Docket90-16140
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 992 F.2d 243 (Jack Wayne Friend v. Ronald Kolodzieczak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jack Wayne Friend v. Ronald Kolodzieczak, 992 F.2d 243, 93 Daily Journal DAR 6255, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3634, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 11358, 1993 WL 158469 (9th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

The Supreme Court granted the petition for writ of certiorari, vacated the judgment, and then remanded this cáse to this court for further consideration, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1038, 122 L.Ed.2d 348, in light of Farrar v. Hobby, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 566, 121 L.Ed.2d 494 (1992).

This court now remands the matter to the district court to re-examine its determination of the reasonableness of the attorneys’ fee award in light of the Farrar v. Hobby decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
992 F.2d 243, 93 Daily Journal DAR 6255, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3634, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 11358, 1993 WL 158469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-wayne-friend-v-ronald-kolodzieczak-ca9-1993.