Jack W. Rivers v. Frank W. Wood
This text of 92 F.3d 1189 (Jack W. Rivers v. Frank W. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Jack W. RIVERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Frank W. WOOD, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 95-4111.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted July 12, 1996.
Filed July 19, 1996.
Before WOLLMAN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Jack W. Rivers, a Minnesota prisoner, appeals the district court's1 denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). The district court denied Rivers' application, concluding that he failed to state a constitutional claim for relief. Having carefully reviewed the record and the arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court committed no error of fact or law, and an opinion would lack precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 F.3d 1189, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27981, 1996 WL 402998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-w-rivers-v-frank-w-wood-ca8-1996.