Jack v. Virginia Employment Commission

Fourth Circuit

Jack v. Virginia Employment Commission

546 F. App'x 169

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 8, 2013·No. No. 13-1918·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Todd M. Jack appeals the district court’s orders dismissing this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), (b)(6) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jack v. Virginia Employment Comm’n, No. 1:13— cv-00350-CMH-JFA, 2013 WL 3242703 (E.D.Va. June 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Todd M. Jack appeals the district court’s orders dismissing this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), (b)(6) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jack v. Virginia Employment Comm’n, No. 1:13— cv-00350-CMH-JFA, 2013 WL 3242703 (E.D.Va. June 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Jack v. Virginia Employment Commission, 546 F. App'x 169 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

546 F. App'x 169 (Jack v. Virginia Employment Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.