Jack v. Stubblefield

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 9, 2009·No. 09-1758·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1758

TODD M. JACK, M.S., Ph.D., Trustee,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM STUBBLEFIELD, Ph.D., County Commissioner of Berkeley County,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (5:09-cv-00046-gec)

Submitted: August 28, 2009 Decided: September 9, 2009

Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Todd M. Jack, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Todd M. Jack appeals the district court’s order

dismissing this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

(ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Jack v. Stubblefield, No. 5:09-cv-00046-gec

(W.D. Va. filed June 22, entered June 23, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jack v. Stubblefield, (4th Cir. 2009).

Jack v. Stubblefield (Jack v. Stubblefield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)