Jack v. Stubblefield
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1758
TODD M. JACK, M.S., Ph.D., Trustee,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM STUBBLEFIELD, Ph.D., County Commissioner of Berkeley County,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (5:09-cv-00046-gec)
Submitted: August 28, 2009 Decided: September 9, 2009
Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Todd M. Jack, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Todd M. Jack appeals the district court’s order
dismissing this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Jack v. Stubblefield, No. 5:09-cv-00046-gec
(W.D. Va. filed June 22, entered June 23, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jack v. Stubblefield (Jack v. Stubblefield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.